Few man can portray human beings like Dostoevsky does. He's the master of masters.
Even the great Einstein had once said, "Dostoevsky gives me more than any scientist, more than Gauss".
"The Idiot", often considered as one of the greatest work of Dostoevsky, proves this-and how!
The master portrays truly amazing image of a man whom they all call an Idiot.
Dostoevsky's motives for writing The Idiot stem from his desire to depict the "positively good man"- Prince Myshkin.
By making Myshkin a paragon of kindness and humility, Dostoyevsky shows what can happen when such a man is confronted by society. Myshkin frequently confronts society's norms with his "idiocy", which is merely his apparently naive approach to life. However, it is merely a search for truth in human relationships, he is not naive about what others say to him and about him, he merely assumes they're true because human beings should have no need for falsehood. The prince frequently faces various social turmoils throughout the novel, petty arguments and ridiculous assumptions. Unfortunately, the "idiot" cannot save himself from society and fails in the end. [description from wikipedia]
Myshkin is indeed one of the most beloved and truest character in literature. A child at heart, naive and ever kind - closer to being a saint.
I wish we had a few Myshkins amongst us right now, amidst all the hatred littered all along.....
4 comments:
Myshkin, eh? I read Nikolai Gogol's Raincoat. Russian's are weird man. Then I started with Crime and Punishment. Not an easy book to read.
On an entirely irrelevant note, there is this Tamil movie director named Mysskin (pronounced Myshkin) who made a movie called Anjathey - a cop story - AWESOME direction. Full attitude in direction.
Anyway.
raincoat or Overcoat u mean ?
Overcoat is good, but i didnt understand the last part !
I think we do have them amongst us, don't we? :-)
>:K<
Absolutely Kau - i wud echo ur last lines,, somebody was telling me about the Overcoat concluding part.. who, i don't remember!
Post a Comment